|
HS Code |
992303 |
| Material Type | Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polyamide (PA) |
| Matrix | Polyamide (Nylon) |
| Reinforcement Type | Carbon Fiber |
| Carbon Fiber Content | 15-30% by weight |
| Density | 1.2-1.4 g/cm3 |
| Tensile Strength | 120-220 MPa |
| Flexural Modulus | 8-12 GPa |
| Elongation At Break | 1.5-3% |
| Heat Deflection Temperature | over 150°C |
| Surface Finish | Matte with visible carbon fibers |
| Electrical Conductivity | Low (insulating) |
| Water Absorption | Lower than unfilled PA |
| Color | Black or dark grey |
| Printability | Requires hardened steel nozzle |
As an accredited Carbon Fiber Reinforced PA factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Industrial-grade Carbon Fiber Reinforced PA, 5kg spool, vacuum-sealed with desiccant in a sturdy carton box for moisture protection. |
| Container Loading (20′ FCL) | Container Loading (20′ FCL) for Carbon Fiber Reinforced PA: 18-22 metric tons, securely packed in pallets or bags to prevent damage. |
| Shipping | Carbon Fiber Reinforced PA should be shipped in sealed, moisture-proof packaging to prevent contamination and moisture absorption. Store and transport the material in a cool, dry area, away from direct sunlight and chemical contaminants. Packages should be handled carefully to avoid damaging the fibers or altering the material's properties during transit. |
| Storage | Carbon Fiber Reinforced PA should be stored in a cool, dry place, away from direct sunlight and moisture to prevent degradation. Keep the material in sealed packaging when not in use to avoid absorption of humidity, which can affect performance. Ensure the storage area is free from extreme temperatures and chemical contaminants to maintain the integrity and strength of the compound. |
| Shelf Life | Carbon Fiber Reinforced PA typically has a shelf life of 12–24 months if stored in cool, dry conditions, sealed from moisture. |
Competitive Carbon Fiber Reinforced PA prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615365186327 or mail to sales3@liwei-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615365186327
Email: sales3@liwei-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Experience in compounding engineering plastics has shown that expectations for strength and reliability continue to climb year after year. Many customers ask about reducing weight, boosting strength, and stepping up part longevity. Carbon fiber reinforced PA (polyamide) isn’t just another product rolling off the line. It stands out as a specific response to these evolving demands. We started compounding this grade because many clients found that traditional glass fiber nylon just left too much on the table, especially for demanding structural applications.
Our carbon fiber reinforced PA uses a carefully selected polyamide base, available in both PA6 and PA66 models depending on process and strength needs. We blend it with carbon fibers with controlled sizing, continuously focusing on dispersion, fiber length retention, and interface with the nylon matrix. Here, everything happens under our tight supervision: resin drying parameters, screw design, venting configuration, melt filtration, and cooling. Our team monitors the carbon fiber flow to keep fibers intact and maximize load transfer, which means the product we deliver feels more like engineering than just manufacturing.
Typical loading levels in our portfolio range from 10% to 40% carbon fiber by weight, with our most commonly supplied models sitting at 20% and 30% CF for an optimal balance of tensile strength, stiffness, and processability. The PA66 30% carbon fiber variant runs a tensile strength above 210 MPa, with tensile modulus exceeding 18 GPa, and heat distortion above 230°C at 1.8 MPa, measured in-house using ISO standard methods. Water absorption remains distinctly lower than with glass fiber versions, and surface resistivity often comes in well below 104 Ω, if you need static dissipation. We track mechanical loss after aging, hydrolysis cycles, and long-term fatigue. None of these numbers remain abstract: each batch gets real-world QC in our on-site mold shop to see flow, weld-line strength, and dimensional repeatability.
A big part of the story comes down to weight savings. Carbon fiber’s strength-to-weight ratio sits much higher than both glass and mineral filled options. One customer switched from 30% glass fiber PA66 gears to 30% carbon fiber and hit over 20% mass reduction, translating to lower inertia and better efficiency on the production line. That’s the kind of result we look for when suggesting this material to design engineers. Higher modulus means less flex in parts like drone frames, bracket arms, or pump impellers, with thinner wall sections still outlasting old glass fiber standards. We see automotive clients moving to CF-reinforced PA for seat frames, shifter bases, and pedal assemblies, tapping into lighter parts that don’t give up on load or safety factor.
Thermal properties also turn out favorably. Our blend holds stiffness well at elevated temperatures—where glass reinforced versions start to deform, carbon’s retention of shape and strength reduces creep and out-of-spec parts, especially near hot engine compartments or electronic enclosures. We’ve tested components cycling between -40°C and 140°C for weeks on end, and only minor changes register. Our customers notice fewer mounting failures in assembled modules, and fewer returns on high-spec applications.
Day-to-day, the biggest question on the shop floor is: why not just use glass fiber nylon? The answer is practical. With glass, the density averages near 1.6-1.7 g/cm3, compared to 1.3-1.4 g/cm3 for the same carbon percentage. That feeds directly into both shipping cost and moving part inertia. The surface appearance also changes. Carbon fiber reinforced PA leaves parts with a satin black, clean look— one that holds up under repeated handling and doesn’t show glass whiskers or “soapy” color, even after multiple molding cycles. For many housings, consumer goods, and visible mechanical parts, appearance isn’t just a side benefit: it cuts finishing steps, sanding, or coating.
We track the fatigue and vibrational damping: carbon fiber handles repeated loading with less microcracking, providing components that last longer in cyclic loading applications. In our comparison studies for bicycle components, suspensions, or mirror housings, glass fiber parts developed stress white marks or fractured at weld lines after months of cycling, while carbon fiber reinforced PA maintained integrity. Chopped carbon fibers bridge weld lines more effectively and resist stress risers where glass-filled parts typically fail.
We’ve spent years tuning our extruders, gear pumps, and underwater pelletizers to suit the quirks of carbon fiber. Fiber attrition can kill performance, so our compounding lines handle each fiber bundle with soft handling zones and screw geometries that minimize breakage. Unlike off-the-shelf blends, we check that the finished pellets carry the expected fiber length using microscopy in our QC lab, then test resultant molded panels for tensile, flexural, and impact strength. Inconsistent batches simply don’t leave the warehouse.
One challenge comes as carbon fiber loads cross 30%. The resin flow shortens, which means molders see higher viscosities. We guide process engineers: dry the material thoroughly, raise mold and barrel temperatures, and avoid cold slugging. Our experience says the payback in molded strength justifies these tweaks to molding parameters. Fibers do not stop equipment wear, so we carry hardened steels on both extrusion line and injection unit. When customers visit our facility, the difference in maintenance intervals between carbon and glass filled lines gets obvious—hard tooling sees twice the service life under carbon filled loads.
Another difference comes with electrical conductivity. Carbon fiber reinforced PA offers a degree of static conductivity that opens up applications in electronics, antistatic parts, and automotive sensor housings. Our typical 30% CF PA66 delivers a surface resistivity within a conductive or dissipative range (103–106 Ω), something glass or mineral-filled plastics cannot deliver. This stat-dissipative behavior prevents dust build-up and charge accumulation, reducing failures in sensors, connectors, and in-touch human interface parts. We get feedback from customers in the electronics sector—smaller, safer boards, and connectors made possible.
Another point: carbon filled grades hold up better under UV and weathering. Our synthetic polymer team runs accelerated aging in ASTM chambers, finding that color and strength loss lag far behind traditional filled grades. For outdoor drone frames, sporting goods, or automotive exterior covers, fading and embrittlement reduce sharply. Our formula skips color masterbatches prone to chalking, as the natural black ensures stability for longer service cycles.
Demand for advanced polymer composites isn’t just about performance—environmental regulations and lifecycle management shape material selection. Carbon fiber reinforced PA offers lower part densities, so end products weigh less and ship cheaper. That’s direct energy savings, both in processing (lower melt index means quicker cycle times) and in logistics. On more advanced lines, we’re running recycled PA blends with secondary carbon fibers—mostly from aerospace scrap—integrating reclaimed feedstock and closing the material loop. For OEMs following EPR or “Green Deal” guidelines, this lets customers score real points on sustainability metrics.
While base polymers like PA6 and PA66 do come from petroleum sources, the product’s life extension, drop in replacement rates, and reduced failure rates often outweigh any embedded energy at the start. Our design team routinely works with clients on “fewer parts, longer cycles” projects—improving fatigue and wear means less frequent overhaul in things like power tools, transport components, and precision gears. At the end of service, scrap carbon-nylon lends itself well to energy recovery in standard municipal incinerators due to a low ash content and high BTU yield.
For anyone weighing up environmental impact, our LCA numbers indicate that using carbon fiber filled polyamide instead of equivalent glass-filled grades can mean up to 30% reduction in lifecycle carbon emissions—especially when lightweighting achieves major logistics or transport energy savings.
We supply this grade to a mix of customers in automotive, aerospace, consumer electronics, medical devices, and sporting goods. They come to us because they need reliability built into every pellet, and they want support not just in records, but on the production line. We’ve developed specific models for drone chassis, bicycle forks, laptop shells, and surgical components, tuning characteristics for each field by working side by side with client design and quality teams. A customer making medical braces relied on our 20% CF-PA66 for its resistance to body fluids and fatigue, which let them cut product weight and boost user comfort with no rise in part failures.
In automotive, we’ve supplied shifter bases that survive 100,000 loading cycles in our fatigue rigs with no fiber breakout or embrittlement, and engine covers that hold tolerances after long-term heat soak. On the consumer products end, our pelletizable compounds give parts with tactile finishes and low surface roughness—essential for exposed parts like phone cases, laptop frames, and handles.
It’s worth noting how collaborative development with clients really pushes the technology. One OEM wanted to use CF-reinforced PA for a foldable e-bike hinge. We optimized both fiber loading and lubricant additives, trialed several compounding passes, and rapid-milled prototype stock. The design passed European pedal force loading, and they went on to full production within a season. We pulled a similar approach with drone makers looking for stiffer arms in cold weather; after tuning, our PA66-CF held performance under field fatigue up to -20°C where older glass grades fractured.
With the experience we have as manufacturers, we remind customers that carbon fiber reinforced PA needs care before it enters the press. Pellets must stay dry—they pick up moisture faster than homo-polymer grades because micro-cracks from the fiber surface offer more absorption points. In our shop, every auger-fed loader has a desiccant dryer running, outputting resin in under 0.1% moisture to ensure those molded parts come out crisp, dimensionally accurate, and free of bubbles or silver streaks. For complex or thick wall sections, this duty becomes even more vital.
We’ve found that blends with 20–30% carbon fiber flow best on medium- to large-tonnage presses, as long as tools have radiused flow paths and polish at shut-off surfaces to keep fiber length up. For very thin-wall molding—like in notebook shells or filament winding operations—a PA6-based CF blend flows easier, so we recommend it there. As for coloring, nothing beats the deep black achievable with CF-PA. Fabricators have asked about colored compounds, but strong dark undertones make conventional pigments difficult to show—something we solve in special projects by using high-performance dispersions matched directly to carbon black undertones.
We receive samples from new customers weekly. Most return positive feedback after a single trial; parts run with higher yields, show less warpage, and test better for long-term part integrity under lab and field stress. For anyone scaling up, we share our run books and setup profiles to cut learning curves.
Direct experience mixing, extruding, and molding carbon fiber filled PA lets us provide more than just standard blends. Our lab constantly runs new test batches for electrical property tuning, fatigue improvement, and custom speed-to-market trials. In joint projects with clients, we test mechanical retention after simulated aging or high-cycle use, evaluating at not just initial readings, but at 500, 1000, or even 10,000 hour marks. Carbon fiber consistently yields superior creep and load bearing, making our material preferable as industries shift toward leaner, high-strength designs.
We don’t hide that carbon fiber compounds carry a slightly higher cost than glass filled equivalents, both on material input and in machine wear. Yet, part for part, the drop in post-processing, lowered cycle times, and weight savings almost always justify the switch. For high-value, performance critical components, there is simply no glass-filled PA capable of matching the blend of lightness, stiffness, and toughness achieved by chopped carbon grades.
For future lines of advanced electronics, personal mobility devices, and even next-generation medical assemblies, the role of carbon fiber reinforced PA will only grow. We actively solicit client feedback, and we run real-world validation through both our internal engineering and customer field reports. Hearing back that our product solved a longstanding fatigue or cracking issue gives the work meaning—none of this could be achieved by simply trading standard resins. Living with the challenges and improvements, from fiber length preservation to on-time delivery, is what sets a real manufacturer’s offering apart.
Looking back at years of hands-on work with carbon fiber reinforced PA, it’s clear that chemistry, process expertise, and listening to clients cradle every success this material brings. Unlike commodity resins, this grade rewards careful manufacturing: better pellet quality delivers tougher, lighter, and more reliable parts. For companies aiming to hit new targets for durability, form factor, or weight, few materials open doors like carbon fiber reinforced PA. Every batch that leaves our reactors reflects hard-won experience, and every improvement we offer gets proven first in our shop—not just in the sales brochure. That’s how we keep our customers running at the cutting edge, batch after dependable batch.