|
HS Code |
659590 |
| Form | Powder/Slurry |
| Diameter | 0.8-2 nm |
| Length | 1-30 µm |
| Purity | ≥90% |
| Surface Area | ≥400 m²/g |
| Electrical Conductivity | High |
| Color | Black |
| Bulk Density | 0.05–0.2 g/cm³ |
| Solubility | Insoluble in water (dispersible with surfactant or in certain solvents) |
| Ash Content | <2 wt% |
| Thermal Conductivity | High |
| Od Id Ratio | 1.1–1.9 |
| Amorphous Carbon | <5 wt% |
| Synthesis Method | CVD (Chemical Vapor Deposition) |
As an accredited Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Powder/Slurry factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | The packaging contains 100 grams of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Powder/Slurry, sealed in a moisture-proof, anti-static, resealable aluminum foil pouch. |
| Container Loading (20′ FCL) | 20′ FCL loaded with securely packed Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube powder/slurry in sealed, labeled drums or containers to prevent contamination. |
| Shipping | Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Powder/Slurry is shipped in tightly sealed, anti-static containers to prevent contamination and moisture exposure. Packaging meets international hazardous material standards. The shipment is labeled with appropriate safety and handling instructions and includes a Safety Data Sheet (SDS). Temperature-sensitive batches may require climate-controlled shipping. |
| Storage | Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Powder/Slurry should be stored in tightly sealed, labeled containers in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated area away from direct sunlight, sources of ignition, and incompatible substances. Avoid exposure to moisture and air to prevent agglomeration or degradation. Secondary containment is recommended to prevent spills. Access should be limited to trained personnel using appropriate personal protective equipment. |
| Shelf Life | Shelf life of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Powder/Slurry is typically 2 years when stored in a cool, dry, sealed container. |
Competitive Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Powder/Slurry prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615365186327 or mail to sales3@liwei-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615365186327
Email: sales3@liwei-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Years ago, single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) were more headline science than working material. Today, our reactors run nearly every day churning out kg-batches of SWCNT powder and slurry, as order sheets cross our desks from battery researchers, electronics engineers, and materials scientists around the world. We did not arrive here overnight. Moving from gram-scale to industrial output, handling the performance gap between what looks good on paper and what answers the daily demands of manufacturing, took serious work.
Let's talk about why people keep coming back to SWCNTs and why powder and slurry models have emerged as not just two styles, but as fundamentally different tools for industry.
We live in a world that rewards lighter, stronger, and faster materials. As a chemical manufacturer, I see how this shapes our clients’ priorities. Our battery clients want electrodes that last more cycles before fading. Our polymer customers keep chasing conductive additives that won’t just spike cost or work for only one production run. Electric vehicle makers talk about energy density and weight like goldsmiths counting coins.
SWCNTs answer these wishes in a way other carbon materials never managed. At their core, these are cylinders of pure carbon, just nanometers wide but easily stretching thousands of times longer. Surface area through the roof, strength far greater than steel, native conductivity, and a chemical stability that holds firm in caustic, hot, or high-voltage environments.
Simple graphite can’t touch that. Standard multi-walled CNTs—still solid for many purposes—don’t pack the same punch per gram. Activated carbon, carbon black, even vapor-grown carbon fibers all have their uses, but none land quite the same combination of properties in such a tiny, scalable platform. That means SWCNTs aren’t just “different.” They open up applications that stall flat with traditional additives or coatings.
Our powder SWCNTs roll out of the reactor dry, free-flowing, and with as little processing as practical. We’ve learned the hard way to tweak catalyst formulations and reactor temperature profiles in a way that balances length with dispersibility. This makes or breaks what the customer gets. In powder form, control means everything: tap density, aspect ratio, purity by weight, and even consistent surface oxygen content.
Some of our partners want as little as 95% purity because they mold the nanotubes into composites where value lies in conductivity, not perfect atomic order. Others, especially semiconductor clients, request >99.9% tubes and a specification sheet that reads like a legal contract. We’ve tailored models to these workflows with batch analytic testing, but keep our production rooted in a stable, scalable fluidized-bed process. Our most common powders run batch-to-batch consistency within a few percentage points on diameter and length distributions—something early market entrants struggled to offer.
Powder models offer ultimate flexibility for users who intend to blend, mill, or even functionalize SWCNTs in their own labs. Powder form fits teams with in-house capability to disperse and process: adding nanotubes to a masterbatch, solution-suspending in organic solvents, or mixing directly with metals, ceramics, or glass. The flip side is extra process work, additional regulatory steps, and dust management.
We shifted to producing slurries after listening to what frustrated people in pilot lines. Making nanotubes dispersible—really dispersible, in meaningful volume, without tens of hours of sonication—changes cost and workflow faster than tweaks in chemical purity ever could. Our slurries ship out as stable, high-concentration colloidal suspensions, often in water but sometimes in organic carriers.
We don’t use catch-all recipes. Each slurry batch follows its own blending sequence: pH adjustment, the right balance of gentle surfactants, shear mixing at controlled temperatures. Our engineers stand by a tank, test a sample for viscosity and conductivity, and never hesitate to trash a batch that won’t meet a minimum shelf life or conductive threshold. These slurries pour directly into blends for batteries, printed electronics, supercapacitors, and even coatings for EMI shielding or antistatic films.
Slurries reduce mess and risk. No one wants aerosolized nanocarbon in a commercial plant. They also save real time and labor versus powder. Still, slurry customers give up some shelf life and must factor in the carrier’s impact on downstream process: evaporation curves, residual additives, and sometimes extra regulatory paperwork.
Every time we convert a client from carbon black or MWCNT to SWCNT, the same questions come up. What proof do you have this will survive our curing step? Will it clump in a month? How do we justify cost per kilo? Real answers come from open data and from production experience, not from handwaving. We keep a file of application notes, not just stock material safety data sheets, but real-world production logs from batteries, conductive additives, membranes, and composite films that have run on our lines—and theirs.
One test for a battery additive might involve mixing our slurry into a standard cathode ink. We track slurry stability during storage for three months, then measure composite conductivity after drying, cycling lifespan after 500 full deep discharge cycles, final swelling rate in electrolyte, and show how much metal current collector you can skip. Every number goes into our customer-facing dossier, and we circle back with clients to refine spec sheets and blending protocols.
A powder batch tells its own story: freshly tumbled, it flows easily through a 50-micron sieve. Standard Raman and TGA spectra for every drum, showing contamination far below 5%. We never claim magic jumps in performance, but the truth is most end-users first see a 20–70% rise in conductivity or a tenfold boost in mechanical strength at the same loading level. They make the switch because failure rates plummet, rework drops, and eventually the per-unit cost of the finished part falls below that of legacy systems.
SWCNTs hold up to heat and voltage, but what sells this material is reliability. A molecular-strength material that doesn’t degrade under continuous load transforms how many industries look at design margins.
Every client pushes this question. Why pay this much for a black powder when carbon black or graphene oxide sits on the market for pennies? It’s easy to answer after a run through the numbers, but the differences start with the structure.
Take carbon black: distribution is broad, surface area rises by lowering carbonization temperature, but aggregate size fluctuates wildly, and electrical performance tops out at a fraction of SWCNT’s. Graphene oxide, meanwhile, can push mechanical strength but at an expense of edge defects and irregular sheet size that slow down processability and lead to lower yields. Multi-walled nanotubes fill gaps for less sensitive work but often bring higher impurities, inconsistent conduit formation, and variable length.
Our SWCNT powder forms a true one-dimensional crystal with minimal defects, supported by Raman ID/IG ratios well above 9.0, and mean diameter accuracy stuck to single decimal points in nanometers. Typical batches clock surface area north of 700 m2/g and electrical conductivity easily higher than 104 S/m in thin films—a number that reflects what real pilots see, not a cherry-picked single lab test.
Mixing in SWCNT, you get a percolation threshold at much lower loading. In batteries, that means thinner electrodes, higher energy density, sometimes even a cut in expensive active metal content. In polymer composites, we have customers who call to tell us their product cracked half as much on drop tests after switching—a result of the load transfer properties of SWCNT networks, not seen with agglomerated fillers.
The environmental persistence of SWCNTs often draws scrutiny, but three years of waste analysis showed negligible release rates from finished goods thanks to covalent bonding to matrices in rubbers, epoxies, and plastics. Many other carbon nanomaterials do not bond as tightly, leading to higher release or breakage.
In summary, you do not buy carbon nanotubes just for “nano” branding—you use them to beat the physical limits of mass-market carbon.
No one should underestimate the challenge of mixing SWCNTs—agglomeration starts the moment a powder leaves the reactor, and many promising materials have failed to scale up because dispersion issues wrecked their application value. We’ve learned, through a combination of trial, error, and more than a few ruined extruder runs, how to guide customers past this.
Dry mixing powder works for certain bulk elastomer or sheet forming steps, but for films, coatings, or battery electrodes, full dispersion into a liquid or pre-polymer becomes essential. That is why our slurries rarely leave the facilities before we send detailed advice on solvent compatibility (water, NMP, ethanol), tips for pH adjustments, and sonicator protocols designed for kilo-scale not bench vials.
Most difficulties in bringing SWCNTs to high-yield manufacturing come from process details, not chemistry. Each week our technical support team fields calls about viscosity spikes, poor filterability, or agglomeration in cross-linked systems. Solutions begin with measuring incoming resin or binder purity, matching the right surfactant to the pH and ionic strength of the surrounding medium, and advising on order-of-addition to avoid prematurely networked tubes.
Scaling up always brings surprises. In sheet extrusion you might find that an increase from 1% to 2% SWCNTs yields not double, but ten times higher mechanical resilience. But shift to a different screw profile or a 50% higher throughput, and suddenly agglomeration rears its head again, killing performance. That is why no batch leaves our plant without end-use advice tailored to equipment and application type.
Characterization means trust. Even if the specs look familiar, buyers want to see real proof that each drum or pail of SWCNT matches their critical path. We developed in-house protocols over years of mistakes and successes. For powder, every batch gets Raman, XRD, and BET surface analysis. For our slurries, zeta potential and TGA run as standard; stability testing runs three months at 40°C and room temperature.
Sheet resistance, powder tap density, and fluid rheology matter much more than a “nominal” spec. These tests identify bad batches fast. In time, that’s saved clients countless hours and thousands of dollars in lost runs. Our policy never hides flaws: every client with a failed application sees the full production log and analytic output.
No other customer group demands tighter quality than lithium-ion battery R&D. They reject blends on the tiniest uptick in resistance or viscosity outside their design space. So we check not just raw electrical figures, but slurry shelf life, sedimentation rate, pH drift, and even photomicrograph batch summaries to flag subtle mold or aggregation risks. Anyone who has spent late nights sifting failed pilot lines knows how essential this data is for staying on track.
The tide of sustainability lifts and complicates everything. Early SWCNT production chewed through energy and solvents by the liter. Newer reactors now operate under tight protocols: full gas re-circulation, staged catalyst addition, and solventless slurry blending on-site to cut waste. Emissions and solid waste drop with each process change. Real data shows that for every kilo finished today, less than half the consumed natural gas or solvent escapes as exhaust compared to the reactors we ran five years ago.
But after we sign off a batch, the regulatory headaches fall on users just as often as on us. Global standards for nanomaterials shift faster than in most chemical fields. US, EU, and Asian regulators ask for particle size, exposure pathway, and migration studies, sometimes in triplicate. Our lab supports clients with all up-to-date compliance certificates and help in crafting custom reports for their markets.
Safety takes real investment upfront—extraction hoods, particle monitoring, sealed drums, and regular air quality checks in both our own plants and at major customer installations. Each year brings new monitoring and safer packaging as feedback comes in from people working not only in research, but in high-throughput industrial settings.
The last decade saw a shift in carbon nanomaterial use. We no longer chase headlines about theoretical strength, but put SWCNTs to work inside real batteries, fuel cells, biomedical sensors, smart textiles, and flexible circuit boards. Powder and slurry models open very different doors: powder to those fine-tuning at the molecular level, slurry to the line operators counting cycle times and defect rates.
Our team now spends as much time improving blending protocols and equipment compatibility as boosting numbers on a purity sheet. This has meant swapping hundreds of technical emails, running in-house pilots, and training partner labs on best practices for dispersion and scale-up. We see the future not as a shift away from bulk carbon, but as a steady expansion: SWCNTs in more of the world's long-life batteries, high-end structural composites, and emerging microdevices demanding miniaturization and performance never possible before.
What keeps us moving forward is results. Conductivity maps that prove electronic components can shrink and survive more stress. Polymers that crack less and protect more. Coatings that turn ordinary surfaces into extraordinary ones. Each successful application gives us more grounds for believing in what well-produced SWCNTs offer industry—a material now earning its slot as a genuine workhorse, not just a laboratory promise.