Yudu County, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China sales3@liwei-chem.com 748718781@qq.com
Follow us:

Antioxidant 264/BHT

    • Product Name Antioxidant 264/BHT
    • Chemical Name (IUPAC) 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol
    • CAS No. 128-37-0
    • Chemical Formula C15H24O
    • Form/Physical State Powder/Solid
    • Factory Site Yudu County, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
    • Price Inquiry sales3@liwei-chem.com
    • Manufacturer Anhui Liwei Chemical Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    Specifications

    HS Code

    454103

    Chemical Name 2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol
    Common Name BHT
    Cas Number 128-37-0
    Molecular Formula C15H24O
    Molecular Weight 220.35 g/mol
    Appearance White crystalline solid
    Melting Point 69-70°C
    Boiling Point 265°C
    Solubility In Water Insoluble
    Solubility In Solvents Soluble in ethanol, acetone, benzene
    Odor Faint, aromatic
    Storage Conditions Cool, dry place; keep container tightly closed
    Main Application Antioxidant in plastics, rubber, cosmetics, and food
    Stability Stable under recommended conditions

    As an accredited Antioxidant 264/BHT factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing Antioxidant 264/BHT is packaged in a 25 kg net weight fiber drum with double polyethylene liners for moisture protection and safety.
    Container Loading (20′ FCL) Container Loading (20′ FCL) for Antioxidant 264/BHT: 10MT per 20′ container, packed in 25kg bags on pallets for safe shipment.
    Shipping Antioxidant 264/BHT is typically shipped in sealed 25 kg fiber drums, kraft paper bags, or cartons with inner polyethylene liners to prevent moisture and contamination. Stored in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area, it should be kept away from sources of ignition and incompatible materials. Transport follows safety regulations for chemicals.
    Storage Antioxidant 264 (BHT) should be stored in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated area, away from direct sunlight, heat sources, and moisture. It must be kept in tightly sealed containers to prevent contamination and degradation. Avoid storing near oxidizing agents, acids, or strong bases. Proper labeling and handling procedures should be followed to ensure safety and maintain product stability.
    Shelf Life Antioxidant 264/BHT typically has a shelf life of 2 years if stored in a cool, dry, and well-sealed container.
    Free Quote

    Competitive Antioxidant 264/BHT prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615365186327 or mail to sales3@liwei-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8615365186327

    Email: sales3@liwei-chem.com

    Get Free Quote of Anhui Liwei Chemical Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction

    Antioxidant 264/BHT: Our Experience and Perspective as a Chemical Manufacturer

    Shaping Reliability and Safety through Direct Manufacturing

    From the manufacturing floor, experience with chemical additives shapes a thought process based on how real-world needs push technical innovation. Antioxidant 264, conventionally called BHT or Butylated HydroxyToluene, has long played a vital role across plastics, rubbers, coatings, lubricants, and food-contact materials. As a direct producer, the daily work involves more than just meeting a spec. It’s a matter of controlling purity from raw materials up to the packed drum, ensuring product consistency during every production run, and tracking market shifts in both regulation and customer requirements. Despite a crowded field of phenolic antioxidants, including Anox 20, Antioxidant 1010, and 1076, it’s clear from decades of practical feedback that BHT continues to serve as a linchpin for cost-effective, moderate-temperature oxidation protection where higher molecular weight products may either underperform in volatility-sensitive systems or price themselves out of routine applications.

    What it Means to Manufacture BHT

    There’s a difference you feel straightaway between making a chemical in your own reactors and simply repackaging for a brand. BHT manufacturing stretches from sourcing high-quality toluene feedstocks, all the way through dedicated condensation and alkylation steps that generate that signature white, free-flowing crystalline powder. Batch monitoring includes not only HPLC and GC residue analyses but also a history of adjusting reaction solvents and washing protocols to minimize off-color or trace impurity levels. Every year brings technical refinements – reducing dioxane traces, tightening melting point targets, dialing solubility into lighter oils and resins. Across the line, from the 25kg bags to the bulk totes, you confirm uniform granulation and flow, watching for caking after extreme shipping or winter storage. Solving these day-to-day manufacturing problems creates trust; it’s what brings the repeat orders from polymer compounding plants, wire insulation houses, or even specialty color concentrate producers.

    BHT in Polymer Processing: The Known and the Overlooked

    Walking through a plastics plant, the proof of Antioxidant 264’s contribution becomes obvious against the hum of extruders and pelletizers. In polyolefin film, sheet, and fiber processes, BHT guards against scorching, color shift, and embrittlement that can creep in during thermal cycling and oxygen exposure. The molecular structure – a phenol ring with bulky tert-butyl groups – means it reacts with peroxyl radicals fast enough to halt chain reactions without gumming up the system or altering melt flow. Unlike higher-mass stabilizers, BHT’s volatility means it will migrate in low-load systems; that becomes both a pro and a con, depending on end-use. Film producers see an advantage in food-contact packaging, where a stabilizer that doesn’t strongly bind, but holds up through compounding and initial service life, matches regulatory clearance and cost sensitivity. Technical engineers report that in wire sheath production, BHT offers just the right blend of melt-stability in PVC and PE, with a legacy of safety data and global compliance. Yet, every technician knows the limitations: BHT alone won’t stave off degradation in demanding outdoor or automotive conditions, where UV, heat, and smog put the squeeze on polymer longevity. The feedback helps prioritize downstream blending with HP-stabilizers and phosphites; it’s a dance that requires hands-on understanding of all the moving parts.

    BHT in Industrial Oils, Fuels, and Lubricants

    Lubricant and oil formulators face some of the toughest oxidative challenges because elevated temperature and contamination accelerate breakdown. Antioxidant 264 takes a predictable role in this world – added to turbine oils, hydraulic fluids, and gasoline to interrupt peroxide formation that would otherwise gum up equipment and eat through system seals. A refinery or blending plant rarely sticks to only one antioxidant. But BHT’s edge lies in solubility and thermal stability up to moderate operation ranges. So direct feedback from the field – engine shops, maintenance depots, food-processing plants – guides batch-by-batch tweaks. Our internal data show that switching from batch-distilled to continuous synthesis BHT, with a tighter melting point and color spec, positively affects additive packages for Group I and Group II base oils. Even though BHT’s competitors (such as nonylated diphenylamines or alkylated phenols) claim longer life, their price points and compatibility don’t always match base stock realities. For fuel stabilizer blends in markets where biofuel blending is growing, we constantly monitor interaction between BHT and combustion byproduct formation. It’s not just what the spec sheet claims; downtime and failed oxidation tests have a way of making the real cost clear.

    Food Contact, Regulatory Pressure, and Industry Realities

    Regulation walks hand-in-hand with direct manufacturing experience. With BHT, oversight covers not just polymer contact but also food additives and animal feed. Governments in North America, the EU, and parts of Asia repeatedly review the use of BHT across different markets. In packaging and food storage applications, customers look for evidence of compliance with FDA, EFSA, or GB standards, and we get requests for analytical support to document migration or residue levels. When contaminants were detected in certain recycled resins, we were asked not just to guarantee product purity, but to consult on process cleaning and QA traceability. There aren’t quick fixes. You see the value of an audit trail – tracking each lot’s spectral purity, carefully documenting each solvent wash, and testing for trace substances down to parts per million. In the last years, clean-label and reduced-additive trends have pushed the industry to lower use rates and to supplement BHT with tocopherol or ascorbate blends. For many customers, removing BHT isn’t realistic given the cost and function – but the dialogue leads to smarter blending, better traceability, and record transparency. Our technical team often runs in-house tests using customer polymers or processing conditions, sharing methods to achieve both performance and lowered overall additive load.

    BHT versus Other Antioxidants: Choices and Compromises

    Any manufacturer of antioxidants faces an expanding matrix of choices. BHT’s direct competitors include higher molecular weight phenolics (like 1010, 1076, 1135), organophosphites, and hindered amines. Each has a place. Antioxidant 1010 and 1076, for example, show more permanence under severe heat and processing cycles, resisting volatilization in extrusion and molding. Yet, product managers and buyers know that as a function of cost, BHT brings affordability and rapid radical quenching to the table, especially in short-life, high-volume applications that won’t see decades of UV, humidity, or irradiation. These distinctions sound theoretical until a batch of cable insulation fails a brittle-point test or a masterbatch processor deals with off-grade pigment dispersion. Practical reality is that BHT fills nearly every gap where organoleptic neutrality, cost efficiency, and process compatibility rank higher than extreme long-term stabilization. In-house testing between BHT and, say, Antioxidant 1076 routinely finds that customers must double or triple dose of the newer product to gain comparable short-term stabilization against discoloration or melt viscosity drop. Switching stabilizers introduces not only cost implications but workflow adjustments for bulk silos, conveying, and dust control systems. Four decades of cumulative field data give a confidence that few ‘new’ antioxidants match.

    Managing Quality: Lessons Learned on the Production Floor

    Quality in antioxidant manufacturing comes down to repeatability. Each batch run through the reactors gets checked for melt point, color, particle size, and chemical purity. Raw material lots can shift in reactivity or contaminant level depending on changes upstream. We repeatedly see how small deviations – in temperature control, solvent purity, or agitation time – ripple into product performance. For example, unchecked fragmentation during alkylation can bump up side-product content, which affects finished goods bleaching and aging resistance. Our labs run ongoing aging simulations in both open and closed systems to watch for subtle shifts: yellowing, odor, caking. As regulations and customer scrutiny ramp up, our QA teams audit not just the product, but also every step of equipment cleaning and operator training. We always get requests to reduce dust, to improve pour characteristics in automated feeders, and to supply varied packaging sizes for different market segments. Because complaints almost always stem from handling or unforeseen interaction with other additives, knowledge transitions from engineering to customer service. Recurrent collaboration with end users, especially those with in-house physical testing capability, has led us to supply custom-milled, low-dust microgranular forms for industries where dust inhalation or product loss during mixing can spark downstream issues.

    Sustainability Trends and Market Shifts in Antioxidants

    The past decade has seen rising scrutiny of conventional synthetic additives, fueled by consumer pressure and national sustainability targets. Producers face growing questions about sourcing, waste treatment, and closed-loop reuse of packaging. For BHT, some markets nudge toward renewable or “bio-based” antioxidants, even as technical performance and scale-up costs stymie the mainstream. Our research team continuously tests both petroleum-based and renewable feedstocks, looking for routes that cut overall solvent and water use. Applications in flexible packaging, paints, and specialty adhesives see accelerated R&D for antioxidants with tailored migration and residue properties. Over the last five years, customer requests have shifted from standard BHT to blends with reduced monomeric volatile content, reflecting more stringent indoor air and product labeling standards. We also design re-sealable drums and bulk return programs to minimize waste, always in response to direct feedback from the floor and logistics teams.

    Process and Personnel: Building Confidence through In-House Expertise

    Direct manufacturing provides a vantage point on real-world challenges. Production shifts depend on a blend of experienced operators, investment in automated dosing, and in-house analytics. Employee retention matters; seasoned staff catch inconsistencies faster, and are better equipped to trouble-shoot process upsets. Equipment modification, such as new filtration trains or wash stations, often grows from informal shop-floor conversations kicked off by repeat product queries or customer complaints. Once, after clients reported static dust discharge during unloading in dry winter months, our team experimented with anti-static drum liners and improved granule coatings. It didn’t show up in a spec sheet, but reduced handling incidents and sped up silo transfer at several European compounding plants. Stories like these don’t make for glossy brochures, but they reinforce how technical feedback loops between production, lab, and customer use drive all long-term process decisions. As regulatory and sustainability demands tighten, routine in-house training remains the best tool for equipping staff to meet new standards and respond to new process issues quickly.

    Navigating Customer Demands and Continuous Improvement

    Day-to-day, customers expect more than mere product supply. OEMs in automotive plastics want evidence-based recommendations on stabilizer usage mapped to real-life weathering and mechanical stress scenarios. Cable and insulation manufacturers focus attention on batch-to-batch purity, predissolution speed, and migration. Coatings producers to shift to lower-VOC or high-solids formulations, which has led us to finetune BHT particle sizing for increased solubility and easier dosing, especially for waterborne systems. Shop-floor teams have driven proposals for new closed-feed carriage systems after reports of airborne powder loss in high-throughput installations. These customer insights become catalysts for change, from new packaging lines to solvent recovery loops. By logging all technical queries and challenges, the manufacturing team works alongside customers to propose process tweaks, conduct root-cause analysis of failures, and field continuous R&D – all aimed at raising long-term product performance.

    Challenges and Emerging Safety Questions

    No chemical additive remains untouched by updates in science or shifting regulatory consensus. BHT faces ongoing review regarding potential endocrine activity, migration into sensitive food products, and accretive impact in the environment. Direct experience as a manufacturer teaches appreciation for nuance – most published risk assessments tie adverse events to chronic overexposure or extreme-dose scenarios, rather than typical application levels. Yet uncertainty, and the rise of ‘functionality with lower residue’, prompts the team to pursue lower-dosage blends, masterbatches, and even testing for combined effects with alternative phenols or bio-derived stabilizers. The goal is to supply regularity – tight control, actionable data, clear documentation – while acknowledging and acting on evolving understanding of risk. Line operators, analytical staff, and customer QA teams invest daily effort delivering product lots that meet ever-stricter national and corporate requirements, adapting to changes as they come.

    Final Thoughts: Direct Production Experience Shapes Reliable Supply

    Manufacturing Antioxidant 264/BHT in-house grounds all claims in repeated practice – sourcing, reaction control, batch analytics, logistics, and user feedback. Upgrades in purity, particle size, and solvent-use efficiency result not from buzzwords, but from daily troubleshooting and customer trust built over thousands of tons shipped, processed, and tracked. Direct production enables prompt issue response and continuous quality refinement. Antioxidant 264 doesn’t exist in a vacuum; it stands as one solution among many, chosen for its balance of reactivity, compliance, legacy data, and affordability. The market moves quickly, but steadfast commitment to robust process, transparent records, and ongoing technical dialogue keeps our offering current, trustworthy, and precisely fit to shifting industry needs.